Common Ownership
Socialists endorse common ownership because, in their view, private property (productive wealth or capital, rather than personal belongings) has several important drawbacks.
. As wealth is created by the communal endeavour of humans, it should be owned collectively, not by individuals.
Private ty encourages materialism and fosters the false belief that the achievement of personal wealth will bring fulfilment.
· Private property generates social conflict between 'have' and 'have-not' groups, such as owners and workers.
Broadly speaking, socialists-have argued either that private property should be abolished entirely and replaced with common ownership or that the latter should be applied in a more limited way. In the USSR from the 1930s, the Stalinist regime implemented an all-encompassing form of common ownership by bringing the entire economy under state control. More moderate socialists, including the Attlee Labour government in the UK (1945-51), have opted for limited common ownership by nationalising only key strategic industries, including the coal mines, the railways and steel-making, leaving much of the economy in private hands. However, in recent decades, western socialist parties have placed less emphasis on common ownership in favour of other objectives.